Supreme Court Reform Passes House on Party-Lines Vote

After two hours of contentious debate, the Florida House voted on Friday to approve forwarding a proposed constructional amendment to the voters. The proposal passed on a vote that mirrored party lines, with 79 Republicans backing the measure and 38 Democrats voting against it.

When he took the gavel after the November elections, Speaker Dean Cannon, R-Winter Park, called for judicial reform. Before the session started, he called for the creation of two separate courts, one to focus on criminal justice matters while the other would handle civil matters. The proposed amendmentwould increase the number of judges from seven to 10, with five on each of the proposed branches. If the Legislature passes the measure, a constitutional amendment would head to the ballot in November 2012 when it would need 60 percent support to pass. Critics have maintained that Cannon was looking to get back at the state Supreme Court for shooting down a number of proposed amendments backed by the Republicans in 2010, including a redistricting measure against those backed by FairDistricts Florida and one allowing Floridians to opt out of the federal health-care law.

Democrats started the debate by attacking the proposal, which was being backed by Rep. Erik Eisnaugle, R-Orlando, arguing that the Republicans were looking to pack the court, invoking the same phrases that opponents labeled Franklin D. Roosevelts attempt to reform the Supreme Court of the United States after the 1936 presidential election.

This is a very important bill, said Rep. Jim Waldman, D-Coconut Creek, who attacked the proposal. It is neither bold nor innovative nor well-conceived, he added, referring to the measure as an attempt to pack the court.

It is an assault on our Constitution, insisted Waldman, who added that it was an overreach from Republicans looking to control all branches of government.

While Waldman acted, as he has throughout the session, as the floor leader of the Democrats during the debate, Rep. Will Snyder of Stuart, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, led Republicans.

Republicans countered that the measure was needed to help restore the balance of power.

We need to create a stronger check for the judicial branch, argued Rep. Greg Steube, R-Sarasota, who accused the state Supreme Court of overreaching its own power. It is necessary for us to rein in the balance of power and the power of the court.