advertisement

SSN on Facebook SSN on Twitter SSN on YouTube RSS Feed

8 Comments
Columns

Supreme Court Needs to Stay at Nine justices; Dems’ Court-Packing Plan Is All Wrong

March 20, 2019 - 4:00pm
America’s institutions are far from perfect. But over the past two centuries, they have provided a framework for our nation to become the most dynamic, most vibrant, and most exceptional nation in all of human history.
 
At this moment though, our institutions are suffering a crisis of confidence as families fragment and communities crumble. And most Americans view every branch of government with disdain.
 
As we have seen, these problems do not necessarily fade from one election to the next. In fact, they may intensify. The path forward will require Americans, their political leaders, the news media and countless others to set aside the political tribalism that dominates today’s culture.
 
Americans need to view one another as friends, neighbors and coworkers -- not Republicans or Democrats.
 
How does a divided nation overcome corrosive tribalism? Ultimately, we need a restoration of family and community. In the meantime, we should do no further harm. To this end, I am proposing a constitutional amendment to prevent the next political and cultural flashpoint: the packing of the Supreme Court for partisan gains.
 
“I want -- as all Americans want -- an independent judiciary as proposed by the framers of the Constitution,” President Franklin D. Roosevelt explained in a fireside chat 82 years ago. While his language was unifying, FDR’s proposal was a transparent attempt to expand the nation’s highest court so he could appoint additional justices who would not stand in the way of his ambitious political agenda.
 
The modern incarnation of court-packers shares FDR’s goals, though they are less unifying in their language. Proponents of a Democratic-led court-packing scheme foresee an impending “crisis” -- one they use to justify their highly partisan tactics.
 
Last year my colleague Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., warned of an imminent “constitutional crisis.” This year, Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., is warning of a “crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court.” A prominent progressive columnist argues the Supreme Court is now “illegitimate” and that his fellow liberals “need to stay angry.” And a left-wing strategist declared, “Adding seats to the Supreme Court is a necessary step.”
 
As one professor explained, the current Court is “in a position to shatter the national consensus” on a wide range of issues. “For that,” the professor insists, Republicans “must, and will, pay a steep price.” It should come as no surprise this same individual’s book is titled “It’s Time to Fight Dirty: How Democrats Can Build a Lasting Majority in American Politics.”
 
Court packing is quickly becoming a litmus test for 2020 Democratic candidates as this ugly, winner-take-all rhetoric gains prominence in progressive circles.
 
Our nation may not be on the brink of civil war or dissolution, but we are suffering a crisis of confidence and we cannot withstand further erosion of trust in one another and our institutions. The rhetoric used by some of my Democratic colleagues that suggests our institutions are increasingly unable to resolve modern society’s conflicts is dangerous.
 
Thankfully, some progressives understand the danger of heading down this road.
 
Former Obama White House counsel Bob Bauer argues court packing “does not serve to strengthen the institution” because “its actions on the controversial issues would carry less authority, with unpredictable consequences for the rule of law.”
 
Michigan Law School professor Richard Primus, who also clerked for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, warns that court packing would cause federal courts to “lose a hefty share of whatever legitimacy they still retained” in the current politicized era.
 
To prevent the delegitimizing of the Supreme Court, I will introduce a constitutional amendment to keep the number of seats at nine. There is nothing magical about the number nine. It is not inherently right just because the number of seats on the Supreme Court remains unchanged since 1869. But there is something inherently good and important about preventing the further destabilization of essential institutions.
 
Primus provides important historical perspective: “One of the nice things about living in post-Reconstruction America has been that conflict between the major political parties has not escalated all the way to the point of ultimate crisis.”
 
“I’d like us to keep that going,” Primus concludes.
 
Well said. The perceived illegitimacy of institutions -- from local election boards all the way up to the Supreme Court -- threatens to undermine the very nature of our nation. These institutions are the way Americans traditionally mediate disputes among a very diverse population. We must fight to maintain and restore them.
 
Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, Florida's senior senator, is a member of the Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Foreign Relations. FOX News was first to circulate this op-ed.

Comments

If the Republican leadership doesn't take significant steps to muzzle the Mook-In-Chief's absurd conduct and comments ... while returning the party to its more traditional roots ASAP ... the Dems ... with a definite attitude ... are going to clean house in 2020 ... and flip Trumpist Republicanism on its sorry ***! The Supreme Court packing will be only one of many, MANY reversals the Republican Party is going to experience! Take it to the bank. The Dems will 'get even' in spades!

President Trump won where McCain & Romney failed precisely because he is not doing it the way they would have. If the dems pack the court, then the Republicans will do the same when they get the Senate & White House.

The dems won't have the ability to pack the court. They will not have control of the presidency and the senate. They would need both, but they will have neither. President Trump has earned a second term and will be reelected in a landslide victory.

You want to really have a true, honest interpretation of the law, let the SCOTUS be elected by the people.

FIRST pure "Common Sense Thinking" I've heard heard from Rubio that 'mirrors' our U.S. Constitutions intent, "as framed by our "Founders"

How about adding a two thirds vote for confirmation In the Senate to that. Might be actually more productive in reducing partisanship in the court. The current power grab by the GOP is more than sickening. Country before party mr. Rubio.

Then we will never again get a new Supreme court justice.

If the democRat party increases the size of the Supreme Court to give them a majority, it will start a precedent that will happen EVERY time control of the Senate and White House flips to the other party. After control changes hands a few times, the Supreme court will have hundreds of justices. It will NOT stop.

Add new comment

columns
advertisement
advertisement

Opinion Poll

Should the Florida Legislature vote to ban 'sanctuary cities'?
Older pollsResults

Chatterbox

advertisement
Live streaming of WBOB Talk Radio, a Sunshine State News Radio Partner.

advertisement
advertisement