advertisement

SSN on Facebook SSN on Twitter SSN on YouTube RSS Feed

3 Comments
Columns

Iran Deal Imperils Our Energy and National Security

August 30, 2015 - 7:15pm

Those of us who make it a point to stay up-to-date on foreign affairs took great interest in last month’s Iran deal aimed at stopping the volatile country from developing nuclear weapons.

One of the main sanctions the United States lifted in the deal was allowing Iran to export more goods, chief in importance to the country being oil. Not only does allowing Iran to sell oil to a broader global audience improve Iran’s economy, it puts American companies at a distinct disadvantage on the market. Perhaps more important to America, it puts our national security at risk.

The ban on U.S. crude oil was put in place in the 1970s at a time when there was a shortage of oil, you had to stay in line for hours to get a rationed amount of gasoline at the fuel pump amidst fears there wouldn’t be enough oil in the country to sustain us through war time. Middle Eastern countries that controlled the oil market put the United States in that position because they controlled the oil market.

Fast forward to 2015 and the United States is in the middle of an energy revolution, where the country is producing more natural gas and oil than it has in decades and has established itself as an energy powerhouse. We have enough energy that we are able to continue developing new technologies and new sources of energy to supplement traditional fossil fuels. This is good for our economy and we ought to be using that strength to our full advantage.

There are different types of crude oil located in different parts of the world, with some being used for gasoline and other types being used for petroleum-based products – anything from vehicle tires to drinking cups, surf boards and footballs. The United States has an abundance of “light, sweet” crude it currently can’t sell to its allies, while the country needs “sour” crude oil from other countries. So, even with the ban lifted, importing oil is necessary. With the country better able to market its goods globally, America will have more of an influence on oil production and pricing, giving us less of a reason to send our soldiers into conflict.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas last year wrote that if the crude export ban were removed, it would increase U.S. oil prices due to the introduction of new product on the global market. This would lead to increased U.S. production, which would result in the lowering of gasoline and diesel fuel costs for consumers.
 
But allowing countries such as Iran, Russia, Iraq, Venezuela and other oil-producing countries with unfriendly leaders to retain control of the oil market is a step in the wrong direction and potentially puts us at risk. Why should American companies be economically punished while a known enemy is allowed to benefit?
 
A group I represent -- Vets4Energy -- believes there is a clear nexus between energy security and national security, which is why we push policymakers to consider the military and national security with decisions they make on energy. That’s why we call for the crude ban to be lifted. Let’s let American companies influence the foreign market rather than allowing our enemies to harm our economy.

The ban is more than 40 years old and was established because OPEC nations were trying to harm the United States through the influence of their oil. And it worked. We were panicked and our economy took a hit as a result.
 
The United States now has the ability to flex its energy muscle to the benefit of our economy and our national security. We know Iran will soon be flooding the global market with its oil -- some experts believe they may have 20 to 40 million barrels of oil on ships ready to be exported now. Congress has been debating legislation that would lift the ban. Lawmakers should find common sense and do what is in the best interest of our nation.

Cmdr. Tom Garcia (Ret. USN) is volunteer co-chair of Vets4Energy in Florida and lives in Lake Worth

Comments

OK "Joe",...Who said, "A man who would give up 'security' for 'peace', deserves neither."? (There's your answer "Joe Bourassa")

How on earth can anyone support this deal? Amazing!!!! From a fellow Dem, good luck DWS!!!!

I sure agree that the US should be in the World Oil Market, without Government interference, likewise Iran etc. Of course your references to US Security being dependent on oil, prompts me to ask---why is Iran considered an Enemy ? In what way are they able to threaten the real US security ? It sure is time for the US to move the World from a "Battlefield/War Security Mentality" to a "World Marketplace Competitive Agenda".

Comments are now closed.

columns
advertisement
advertisement
Live streaming of WBOB Talk Radio, a Sunshine State News Radio Partner.

advertisement