advertisement

SSN on Facebook
SSN on Twitter
SSN on YouTube
RSS Feed

13 Comments
Politics

High Court’s Contempt for Lawmakers’ Authority, Lawsuit Rackets Make Florida No. 1 'Judicial Hellhole'

December 5, 2017 - 10:15am

As bad as Florida's reputation has been over the last decade and a half as a lawsuit-happy state, a new report says we've "risen" to a new low: "Enough shade has been cast on the Sunshine State to rank it as the nation's worst Judicial Hellhole," says the American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) in its latest report.

The Florida Supreme Court, all on its own, was ranked fourth in ATR reports for the past two years -- for the torrent of liability-expanding decisions it issued, many over vigorous dissents. 

But for 2017-2018, we're No. 1 overall for the first time in the 16 years ATRA has been ranking lawsuit abuse. Read the executive summary and full report here.

The ranking comes a day after the 5th District Court of Appeal upheld a decision by the state Office of Insurance Regulation to reject restrictions proposed by Security First Insurance Co. The ruling was a blow to the Florida insurance industry, which blames trial-lawyer favorite "assignment of benefits" for driving up property-insurance premiums. The industry so far has been unable to persuade a lawyer-heavy Legislature to make changes to the longstanding practice.

The Florida Chamber of Commerce calls ATRA's latest ranking announced this morning further evidence that Florida’s legal climate is among the worst in America.

“Lawsuit abuse in Florida is an increasingly serious and expensive problem, and it just keeps getting worse. On average, it translates into a $3,400 ‘tax’ for Florida’s families each year, due to increased lawsuit abuse costs,” said Mark Wilson, president and CEO of the Florida Chamber.

“There have been five Wall Street Journal articles this year alone talking about Florida’s horrendous lawsuit abuse, the national Institute for Legal Reform named Florida the fifth worst state for legal climate, and now the American Tort Reform Association ranks Florida as the worst Judicial Hellhole," Wilson continued. "How much more evidence do lawmakers need to take action?”

Here are some of the highlights from the executive summary of this 2017-2018 Judicial Hellholes report:

-- The report shines its brightest spotlight on eight jurisdictions or courts that have earned reputations as Judicial Hellholes, including Florida, California, St. Louis, New York City, Philadelphia, New Jersey, Madison and Cook Counties, Illinois, and Louisiana. 

-- The Florida Supreme Court’s liability-expanding decisions and barely contained contempt for the lawmaking authority of legislators and the governor has repeatedly led to its inclusion in this report. And though the high court’s plaintiff-friendly majority this year shrunk from 5-2 to 4-3, a hushed discussion between two majority justices recently caught by an open microphone suggests that this majority is as partisan as ever and brazenly determined to influence the judicial selection process as three like-minded colleagues face mandatory retirement in early 2019. 

-- Meanwhile, an aggressive personal injury bar’s fraudulent and abusive practices in South Florida and elsewhere have also tarnished the state’s reputation. Encouragingly, at least some plaintiffs’ lawyers who’ve crossed the line are being held accountable, either with stiff court sanctions or criminal prosecutions. But with the help of some lawmakers, too many are still getting away with too much, and for the first time in this report’s 16-year history, enough shade has been cast on the Sunshine State to rank it as the nation’s worst Judicial Hellhole. 

“At a time when we’re trying to lower the cost of living on Florida families, this isn’t good news for home and auto owners and their insurance rates. At a time when we’re trying to lower the cost of doing business in Florida, including reducing workers’ comp rates, this isn’t good news,” Wilson said. 

The report’s “Dishonorable Mentions” include singularly unsound decisions by Connecticut’s high court and a Wisconsin appellate court, as well as three tort reform vetoes by Minnesota’s Gov. Mark Dayton, “a plaintiffs’ bar puppet.”

But the report’s 'Points of Light' section this year spotlights the good news, actions taken by attorneys general in Arizona, New Mexico and Nevada, cracking down on often fraudulent disability-access lawsuits that target small businesses.  Several sound state and federal court decisions and verdicts are also applauded, as are 17 positive tort reforms enacted in 13 states in 2017.

“Finally, this year’s three ‘Closer Looks’ examine the U.S. Supreme Court’s jurisdictional decisions in 2017 and their likely impact on forum-shopping, as well as trial lawyers’ growing influence on fast-spreading opioid litigation and the long-respected but suddenly changing American Law Institute,” concluded ATRA President Tiger Joyce.

The Washington, D.C.-based American Tort Reform Association is the only national organization that concentrates exclusively on tort and liability reform through public education and the enactment of legislation.

Reach Nancy Smith at nsmith@sunshinestatenews.com or at 228-282-2423. Twitter: @NancyLBSmith

 

Comments

Read these "comments" Folks; and you'll understand "what you're up against" here in Florida for the coming decades..!

Since moving back to Florida, I've noticed an increase in the number of TV ads paid for by "ambulance chasing" type lawyers. It is distressing to see these ads especially since we have an abundance of elderly residents in Florida who may be exploited by unscrupulous medical vendors and attorneys. Maybe a ban on TV advertising of medical and legal ads might be a start. I'm sure such a ban would be fought by some group that would consider this discriminatory. I remember the day when any self-respecting doctor or lawyer would never stoop to advertising in newspapers, on radio or TV to get business. Sigh.

Since moving back to Florida, I've noticed an increase in the number of TV ads paid for by "ambulance chasing" type lawyers. It is distressing to see these ads especially since we have an abundance of elderly residents in Florida who may be exploited by unscrupulous medical vendors and attorneys. Maybe a ban on TV advertising of medical and legal ads might be a start. I'm sure such a ban would be fought by some group that would consider this discriminatory. I remember the day when any self-respecting doctor or lawyer would never stoop to advertising in newspapers, on radio or TV to get business. Sigh.

LOL!!! Again the thugs in this are republican legislators that again Nancy won't mention by name just like she wouldn't blame people by name for the pollution fiasco dumped on her town.................What's up with that Nancy?........... Next the same thugs won't follow the law or our voted for admenments and give utilities Billions of money for screwing up ................... Where else can you competely waste $2.5B on a nuke thm demand $250 million profit for screwing up? .......... Republicans of course................ As far as SCOF, they are just doing their job protecting people, the law.

Yeah, Jerry, like the activist Supreme Court justices are Republicans. Like the trial lawyers are Republicans. Stick to the point, Jerry.

This is what happens when you put social justice warriors on the bench.

You do understand they were all or almost all put there by republicans so you know whom to blame. And hardly social warriors at all.

So you're saying that Pariente, Labarga, Quince, and Lewis are conservative republicans? ...do you know where in which you speak?

I haven't seen an actual real conservative Repub in quite a while. Fact is you all are so far right you think a real conservative is a liberal now...................Fact is repubs have clearing shown they have no morals or anything left but stealing as much as they can get and making it where companies can screw over the people without a problem, in fact helped big time for utilities, their other paymasters.

Just like you to highlight the press release of the insurance industry. You really are a corporate yellow sheet, aren't you? Hope you never get injured by a defective product or an incompetent doctor -- or lawyer.

Welcome to the "tort reform" bandwagon. That wagon is only interested in stripping injured persons of the last resort for consumer protection--the court house. First, let me say I am not a tort plaintiff's lawyer--if anything I am a "retired" insurance defense counsel that rarely sees a tort case. But no layman seems to understand that lawyers who have a grain of sense do not take loser cases. A good case--whether tort or otherwise--is like a three-legged milk stool. There must be a real injury, there must be someone at fault and finally there must be the ability to respond in damages. To take a law suit on a contingency a lawyer has to evaluate the case under the milk stool standard and then decide if he wants to invest as much as 20 to 25% of the anticipated recovery out of his own pocket to develope the case. And there is always the chance of losing. If a lawyer invests in the case and the jury returns a defendant's "take nothing" verdict, then he is out that money with no hope of any reimbursement!. You folks need to "walk a mile" in our--the lawyer's--shoes before you condemn the practice. By the way, it ain't the court's fault, because they don't file the cases!

Well said David. They all hate lawyers until they need one. And it is only the law, lawyers keeping us from killing each other instead....................Think if we had universal healthcare how much less lawyering we'd need?............ As no longer getting sued so much insurance would drop in cost greatly making it better for business, people at far less cost..

SO,... WHERE'S the "SURPRISE" in THIS article?!?!? How about telling us something we DON'T already know, or are unable to perceive through "normal" attention to the "political", "judicial" and "lawyerly" shenanigans occurring nearly every day !!!! This triumvirate collection of miscreants are singlehandedly "killing the goose that laid the golden egg", known as "Florida" !

Add new comment

politics
advertisement

Opinion Poll

Should Justice Barbara Pariente disqualify herself from deciding if Gov. Rick Scott or his successor should appoint replacements for three Supreme Court justices in January 2019?
Older pollsResults

Chatterbox

Live streaming of WBOB Talk Radio, a Sunshine State News Radio Partner.

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement