advertisement

SSN on Facebook SSN on Twitter SSN on YouTube RSS Feed

26 Comments
Politics

Amendment 3: Voter Control of Gambling in Florida

October 4, 2018 - 6:00am

Ballot Language: This amendment ensures that Florida voters shall have the exclusive right to decide whether to authorize casino gambling by requiring that, in order for casino gambling to be authorized under Florida law, it must be approved by Florida voters pursuant to Article XI, Section 3 of the Florida Constitution. Affects articles X and XI. Defines casino gambling and clarifies that this amendment does not conflict with federal law regarding state/tribal compacts.

How The Amendment Reached The Ballot: Citizen Initiative

What Your Vote Means: A Yes vote on this measure: gives Floridians the exclusive right to authorize casino gambling within the state. A No vote on this measure: keeps the right to authorize casino gambling withthe legislature.

Pro: Amendment 3 gives Florida voters the ability to authorize any expansion of casino gambling. To pass any form of expansion, a 60 percent majority vote must exist. This measure shifts the policy decision from those elected to the voters directly. It also adds language to the Florida Constitution that limits “casino gambling” to: card games, casino games, slot machines, and other similar games. This citizen initiative does not apply to dog racing, horse racing, jai alai, etc. Supporters claim that Floridians should have the final word on casino gambling in the state. By putting the power in the hands of voters directly, Amendment 3 makes it less likely that special interests would be able to influence policy decisions regarding gambling. Advocates of the measure see this as an opportunity to preserve Florida’s “family friendly” culture. This effort comes at a crucial time after the Supreme Court legalized sports betting earlier this spring.

Con: Citizens elect representatives to serve on their behalf. If elected officials do not adequately execute the core functions of the job description, citizens have avenues to replace them. Holding a vote for any expansion of casino gambling leads to unnecessary referendums. The policy and lawmaking function has been delegated to our legislative branch of government. Further, this amendment severely regulates the gaming industry, an industry that could ultimately provide revenue streams to government. Skeptics claim that traditional gambling outlets know expansion would be more difficult via the populace at large. Therefore, it crystalizes the current gambling outlook in Florida for the foreseeable future. Any expansion of gambling would require a 60 percent approval from the voters—a difficult threshold to overcome. Putting the decision in the hands of Florida voters severely limits the potential gambling developments after the recent Supreme Court decision. Gambling already faces a litany of regulations, and this would create another hurdle

 

This amendment is reprinted with permission from the James Madison Institute's 2018 Florida Constitutional Amendment Guide.

 

Comments

The Way this vote works is that It gives the voter meaning YOU! the ability to decide whether you want Casinos expanding. It empowers you as a citizen to choose whether you want something or not. Voting NO would mean that those that are elected representatives would make that decision for you! we all know what some lobbying and money pouring can change some minds.

Would these votes be a statewide vote or a county to vote? Is it specified?? I really don’t want gambling in my county.

Isn’t gambling an addiction, like cigarettes, liquor or herion? This could be an issue, which I don’t see anyone addressing.

Absolutely! Drinking water is an addiction too! Ban water! Lets ban everything because it works!

Water is not an addiction ....ask any child in 3rd grade...Trump might be able to answer you....

Thanks Jamed! Your hate filled comment also helped me decide my vote. Now who’s the retarded moron?

You, my nigga.

If you vote YES, casino gambling will continue to be monopolized by the seminole and miccosukee that is why they want you to vote yes. They want to prevent anyone other than the tribes to have casinos. A yes vote does not put the casino expansion option in the hands of the voters. If you vote NO, the legislature continues to decide whether casino expansion will happen and it gives small business owners of casino gambling the opportunity to apply for licenses to run a casino, it creates better opportunity and no one gets to monopolize the casino industry.

Yes, that's the same impression I'm getting. I also don't like a state wide vote to determine whether a small town wants gambling. That should be up to local legislators and I highly doubt local legislators would support gambling if the majority of constituents are against it. Should Miami voters be deciding if Arcadia wants gambling?

my fear a yes vote is the wrong one.. we moved here from Michigan.. and the tribal casinos have taken over the state completely .. made it illegal for anyone except tribal gambling.. this proposal on the exterior looks great to put the power into the hands of the voters.. but it seems to only give the tribal casino gambling more power.. step lightly .. read the reading of the whole amendment .. i really think we should vote NO ?????? help me figure this out ..

I am voting No on 3.

good point.. its really a double edged sword.. the tribal casino's would gain by this yes vote..

From what I have read, the Seminoles who control most of the hot casino table games and slots are YES on the Amendment because they know both the process and likelihood that voters going from ballot action to an actual outcome are LONGSHOTS... on the NO side are dog tracks who want the Legislature to keep fighting for their right to bring in slots and table games which means better odds.

Thanks, I was going to vote no until I read the remarks

Same for me! This is a yes vote.

Vote "NO" on this Amendment #3. As a refugee from California, take my word for it, do not give more power to these Blue tax-happy voters. Leave the gambling taxes in the hands of the State Legislator to haggle out deals with the Indian owned Casinos, etc. The portion of the tax money collected that goes to the schools helps keep our school taxes down and that is a good thing. It isn't broke, don't fix it.

Thank you. You just helped me make my decision as a Blue prior Californian

God everyone in these comments is a spiteful cuck.

In this state in particular, any power "The People" can take away from the corrupted state legislature is a B-I-G PLUS! Power to "The People"! #VoteBlue #GoGillum

Wow youre retarded... Gillum is an open socialist.... which is corrupt government. He wants to tax everyone to death moron

A person with your intellect is the reason we have Social Security. I wish I could be there to watch you receive your retirement payment from the social security agency.

Only tax the big corporations and the 1%, like the Trumpet and his billionaire friends. Vote for Gollum who cares about the average worker.

Gillum can't run his own city,let alone try to run the State, If he gets in be prepared for higher crime, higher taxes and a big loss in jobs, those tax increases will be passed on the the employee and the public

Thanks for your hate filled comment. I was going to vote no but your comment filled with name calling changed my mind...Vote yes on 3

If the only reason you are voting "Yes" is because someone was name calling, you need thicker skin. Maybe you shouldn't vote. You don't seem to have an idea of what you are voting on and you make decisions based on others comments. Really!!

If voters want to have say in whether large destination Casinos should be developed in their communities they need to vote yes Casinos only benefit those directly involved in their construction and or ownership. they are NOT an economic development benefit but rather they have a overall negative economic impact on communities. At least if referendum #3 passes there will be a public dialogue on the issues regarding Casinos in the targeted development.. This is preferable than having the lobbyists spread big casino money to politicians to make the decision.

Add new comment

politics
advertisement

Opinion Poll

Should the Board of Education select Richard Corcoran as education commissioner?
Older pollsResults
advertisement

Chatterbox

Live streaming of WBOB Talk Radio, a Sunshine State News Radio Partner.

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement