SSN on Facebook SSN on Twitter SSN on YouTube RSS Feed


Democrats Were for a Wall It Before They Were Against It

January 11, 2019 - 7:00am

Barring some miraculous breakthrough, on Saturday the current government shutdown will become the longest in American history. But it has already hit another historic milestone: It is, by far and away, the stupidest government shutdown in American history.

In 2019, the federal government will spend a whopping $4.407 trillion. Yet Congress and the president are shutting down the government in a dispute between the $1.3 billion the Democrats have approved for border security and the $5.7 billion the president is demanding -- precisely 0.0998 percent of the total federal budget. In Washington, that is considered a rounding error.

Worse, Democrats are doing it over a border wall strikingly similar to one that they almost unanimously supported just five years ago. While House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., now says that "a wall is an immorality," back in 2013, she supported a bill that required the construction of 700 miles of border fencing. (Trump has called for a wall of "anywhere from 700 to 900 miles" long.) The bill negotiated by the Gang of Eight, which included current Democratic leaders Sens. Charles Schumer, N.Y., and Dick Durbin, Ill., declared that "not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary [of Homeland Security] shall establish ... the 'Southern Border Fencing Strategy,' to identify where 700 miles of fencing (including double-layer fencing) ... should be deployed along the Southern border."

That's not all. The bill further said that "the Secretary may not adjust the status of aliens who have been granted registered provisional immigrant status ... until 6 months after ... [the Secretary submits] a written certification that ... there is in place along the Southern Border no fewer than 700 miles of pedestrian fencing." In other words, Democrats agreed that no illegal immigrants could get a path to citizenship until all 700 miles of border fencing had been fully completed.

Every Senate Democrat voted for the Gang of Eight bill -- including 36 Democratic senators still serving today. President Barack Obama agreed to sign it. Indeed, he praised the bill for including what he called "the most aggressive border security plan in our history" and said that "the Senate bill is consistent with the key principles for commonsense reform that I -- and many others -- have repeatedly laid out" (emphasis added). That bears repeating: Obama said building a 700-mile fence on the southern border was consistent with the principles of the Democratic Party.

Pelosi supported the Gang of Eight bill, saying at the time that "every piece of this legislation has had bipartisan support" (emphasis added). But now we are shutting down the government over a wall much like the one that Pelosi and Senate Democrats fully supported just five years ago?

Democrats will object that the Gang of Eight bill did fund a border wall, but it was in exchange for a lot of concessions. Of course it was. As Obama said at the time, "the bipartisan bill that passed today was a compromise." But today, Democrats are refusing to compromise or lay out what concessions they would accept in exchange for wall funding. When Trump rhetorically backed off the wall and talked about "steel slats" -- a fence -- Democrats ignored it. When Vice President Mike Pence reportedly offered a deal for $2.5 billion, Democrats dismissed it. In a White House meeting Wednesday, Trump asked Pelosi whether, if he agreed to end the shutdown and negotiate separately on border security, she would support wall funding. She said no.

That is ridiculous.

In their response to the president's address to the nation, Schumer and Pelosi accused Trump of "manufacturing a crisis." That is simply untrue. As The Post reported this week, the United States now faces "a bona fide emergency on the border" as "record numbers of migrant families are streaming into the United States, overwhelming border agents and leaving holding cells dangerously overcrowded with children, many of whom are falling sick."

Democrats could not possibly be in a better position to demand concessions form Trump if they had manufactured a crisis. So put some demands on the table, for crying out loud. If Democrats think they have Trump cornered, then squeeze him and try get a lot out of him. But don't refuse to negotiate and tell us the wall is an "immorality" -- because their voting history shows they don't believe that.

Follow Marc A. Thiessen on Twitter, @marcthiessen.

(c) 2019, The Washington Post Writers Group


This is just a battle for credibility among the left’s more loony extremists who are adamant that Pelosi not give one inch to to Trump. Pelosi herself, very publicly had advocated for a wall years earlier, so did schmucky chucky. The democrats would give 5 billion to the study of worm mating habits or any other absurd cause to any organization who asked, but not for the wall. Hypocrites!

It appears that President Trump and the supporters of the border wall have limited knowledge of geography. If the wall or fence is built it will be on the US side of the Rio Grande, thus fencing ourselves from the shores of the river. Mexico gets to use both shore lines. It is hard to believe that our “real estate developer” president is willing to give Mexico 1800 miles of our beautiful waterfront. Also, the wall or fence will deprive our wildlife from accessing the water of the Rio Grande. This is not a matter of being Republican or Democrat, is a matter of common sense.

Weren't Republicans for keeping the government open before they were against it? Oh yeah, they were. Then our President refused the deal he had agreed to. This is Trump's shutdown. It's McConnell's shutdown. There's a Constitutional cure for a Veto. An override. Without a doubt the adults in the House and Senate would have voted to override the Veto. This, government could already be open. As to what the President wants? That changes day to day, sometimes hour to hour. Do your job. Reopen government and then negotiate border security. Which BTW, was offered and accepted by the President, who then added more demands, and killed the deal because Dems wouldn't roll over. Pathetic on the President's part. Pathetic on the GOP politicians part

I'm for Democrats AGAINST the wall: "READY !",... "AIM !",... "#**%!!!!!!!!"

no wall

The deal here is simply to RESIST TRUMP - the same way McConnell and his wingnut mooks resisted Obama for six years. What goes around, comes around! (Trump had two years with Republican majorities in charge of the House and the Senate - and should have been able to engineer whatever immigration-related changes he and McConnell wanted!)

Open the Government now! Wall or no wall. You do not close the Government for any reason... DO YOUR MF JOB!

Democrats. The FUTURE of this country! YES! they were for a border "FENCE" but never a wall. You Republicans are so stuck in the past. McCarthy is dead. There is no more threat from Communist Russia, so you pick another country to disdain. It's like you can't live in peace and harmony with anyone. If it were up to you, we'd all have abide by your standard of living. The haves, have and the have nots, well, you'd be happy if they all just died, so that your taxes would go down. And you call yourself Christians. At least the Democrats care enough about EVERYBODY equally. Yup! we're OK with a "FENCE". It's cheaper.

Whatever! You should have been a political lawyer, weaseling your way around the facts that virtually every democrat was “for” staunching the flow of illegal immigration until Trump is president. Anyone who wishes to express the truth can see this a a political battle of wills between Trump and Pelosi-Schumer. Democrats vote for free everything which would cost trillions, but balk at 5 billion for the wall! Really!...... Hypocrites, hypocrites, hypocrites

Democrats a cancer upon this country. Most are totally unaware of anything going on and just vote party line. The balance are truly insane and want the country destroyed. Get informed! Educate YOURSELF! Don't be a sheep and blindly follow either party!

Following your analogy, Republicans are a cancer too. They are just as much sheep, as the Democrats. NOW, even more so. So how can one party be more a cancer than the other. Speaking of Party Line, who's not allowing a vote in the Senate, to open up the government. What's that? I can't hear you! REPUBLICAN SHEEP!

Comments are now closed.



Live streaming of WBOB Talk Radio, a Sunshine State News Radio Partner.