SSN on Facebook SSN on Twitter SSN on YouTube RSS Feed


Collateral Damage Of "Credibly Accused"

December 18, 2017 - 7:00am

As the #MeToo movement gained momentum the past several weeks -- and more than a dozen powerful men accused of sexual misconduct were suspended, fired or banished into the outer darkness, it was reasonable to wonder where it would all end.

On Wednesday afternoon, it ended for Kentucky state Rep. Dan Johnson on a remote bridge, where he shot himself with a .40-caliber handgun. In an apparent suicide note posted (briefly) on Facebook, he wrote: "GOD knows the truth, nothing is the way they make it out to be . . . I cannot handle it any longer. . . BUT HEAVEN IS MY HOME."

Johnson was referring to accusations published two days earlier by the Kentucky Center for Investigative Reporting that he had fondled a 17-year-old friend of his daughter during a New Year's Eve sleepover in 2013. According to his accuser, now 21, a drunk Johnson slipped his hand under her top and down her pants as she was sleeping on a couch. She begged him to stop, which, ultimately, he did.

Assuming the woman's story is true, Johnson's actions were reprehensible, made more so by the fact that the girl considered him "a second dad." The betrayal of a trusted adult is a higher order of evil. The circumstances of the alleged event magnify the drama and invite condemnation seasoned with relish. The woman, whose identity is being protected, said the incident occurred at the "Pope's House," a fellowship hall next to the Heart of Fire Church where the well-known Republican was the self-anointed "pope" to his congregation.

Even with all of that, however, didn't Johnson have a right to some sort of dispassionate hearing? It is convenient to think he was too ashamed to withstand what would lie ahead for him. Or, one could believe, as Johnson hoped people would, that things didn't happen as described. That's the trouble with weighing allegations of years-old behavior in the court of public opinion. Given that the statute of limitations precludes indictments in many of these recent cases, we're left to decide for ourselves whether the accusers are telling the truth -- or enough truth to be convincing.

An accusation isn't a conviction or even an indictment, of course. Yet, the Draconian actions we've witnessed as each case comes to light have provided cause for concern even in the most despicable of alleged offenses. We've rather quickly moved away from a society that embraces the suspension of judgment pending a fair trial to one in which subjective opinion -- or fear of financial repercussions -- justifies harsh sentencing.

Why have a jury-trial system at all if we're comfortable passing judgments derived primarily from common sense-based calculus. This we know about common sense: Everyone considers theirs to be of higher quality than mine or yours. During the past couple of months, we've all become rather expert in dispensing verdicts, which seem to go something like this:

When several women tell similar stories of sordid encounters with the same individual, then we deem the accusations true. This was the case with Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein, who admitted to some of the charges. When only one accuser is involved, we tend to give the accused some benefit of the doubt. It's when only three or four victims come forward with similar tales that we begin to hear terms such as "credible accusations" or "credibly accused."

"Credible" accusations brought down Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore after The Washington Post conducted an extensive investigation into allegations against him. There's no proof of anything, of course, but there was enough corroboration from other people interviewed to suggest a strong likelihood that the women were truthful.

Even if one believes all the women who have come forward thus far, there's room for some self-doubt in our individual rushes to judgment, as well as our participation in social media's ruthless, often-anonymous dispensations. We're on new ground these days when everyone occupies a seat of infinite power. Thus, it may be impossible to mitigate the effects of a determined mob, especially given a zeitgeist poised to assume the worst of men and the best of women. This shift in the balance of power may feel justified at some level, but this, too, should give one pause.

Should every man who has ever made an unwelcome advance on a grown woman be ruined? In instances of poor judgement or reckless behavior, is there no punishment short of firing?

It is notable that "shame," so long out of vogue, is in these most modern of times making a comeback, indeed, with a vengeance. Johnson's suicide reminds us that the best of causes conducted without the usual rules of law can lead to disastrous, even fatal, consequences.

Kathleen Parker's email address is

(c) 2017, Washington Post Writers Group


You're "not left to decide for yourselves" Kathleen; and furthermore, the "mob" is not fit to "decide" at all.... Therein "lies the rub" regarding "Hanging Justice", as practiced by "majority rule". On "the other hand", this "nonsensical whining & screeching" will ultimately "shake out" a lying media complex and a "faux-feminist movement" by "Dreamer wannabees" who will never, in their lifetimes, even get near "a glass ceiling"; and instead must settle for a "moment's worth of ignominy" in the manner of "Monica"....

total nonsensical BS, spoken like a true trailer park fool from NY. Why don't you please go back and spare us any more ridiculous hyperbole?

WOW,... Talk about "sexual error",.... HERE'S one (that I venture to say..) condoms were created for...

How can anyone look worse than a rapist and serial exposer?? Get over the hatred of trump and frame the issue for what it is with each individual. Men though, will always be men, they need to be contained for the sake of women, and women need to be louder when things happen, but more thoughtful before they do.

No hatred of Trump, but you are describing him to a T, or maybe Moore. His buddy, cut from the same cloth...

I'm stuck in the middle. I have hard time believing that someone would not have come forward for years, then all of the sudden decides its time to spill the beans. Then again, who are we to say when is the right time to feel OK with coming fwd. about a terrible event. I think the truth lies somewhere in the middle. The Trump example is terrible, that scumbag openly admitted to grabbing people by the crotch and getting away with it. He lies 5 times a day, cheated on 4 or 5 wives, and says and does dumb stuff all the time. I'm not even sure I'd let him touch the remote...

Good Article. Now Explain why Bill Clinton is held in apparently high esteem. No one can deny that he is a philander, that used his position many times to have the sexual upper hand. What he did -numerous times- would have ruined men's careers in addition to damaging women's lives. Additionally, his activities were known in the workplace which meant he in addition to sexual harassment he created a hostile workplace. ANY recognition to Slick Willie Clinton should be removed from public display. He is a constant display of the United States hypocrisy to the world.

who holds him in high regard? compared to who? he looks great compared to Trump...

Way to answer your own question. The Democrats continue to raise big money at fundraisers headlined by Clinton. Maybe when they stop taking money generated by him, stop having him at their events, they can be taken seriously.

Excellent article. Shines light on why Lois Frankel and Kristy Gillyland should resign for misleading the general public and calling for President Trump to resign over false accusations. That so-called attorney Lisa Bloom represented false accusers whose only motivation was money to falsely accuse President Trump. One received an offer of $750,000 to lie about our President. Another woman had her mortgage paid at the direction of Lisa Bloom. Lawyers cannot suborn lies like Lisa Bloom, Gillyland, and Frankel have done. Justice Scalia is spinning in his grave at these gross abuses of #metoo and gross, ugly violations of due process, or lack thereof, and no recognition of the Confrontation Clause. If these alleged acts were criminal, why no police reports? Why wait years to speak up? Motivated by bad intentions and money...sadly. Attention to Scripture is perhaps the cure. 19 Deuteronomy 15-21old principle that if falsely accuse someone then liar receives same punishment they sought). Codify and Implement. lies that hurt a person’s reputation and livlihood just as damaging as the alleged physical act (that never occured) giving rise to false allegation.1: Concerning Witnesses (false accusers)

Comments are now closed.



Live streaming of WBOB Talk Radio, a Sunshine State News Radio Partner.