advertisement

SSN on Facebook
SSN on Twitter
SSN on YouTube
RSS Feed

2 Comments
Politics

Army Corps Gives Input in Florida-Georgia Water War

August 8, 2017 - 8:00pm

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a key player in Florida's decades-old legal fight with Georgia over water flow in the Apalachicola River, has weighed into the pending case before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The federal agency's comments, which were filed in a brief Monday, are important because a special master has recommended that Florida's claim for relief be denied because the Corps, which controls water flow through the region in a series of dams and reservoirs, was not directly involved in the lawsuit.

“Because the Corps is not a party, no decree entered by this court can mandate any change in the Corps' operations in the basin,” Ralph Lancaster wrote in his special master's report in February. “Without the ability to bind the Corps, I am not persuaded that the court can assure Florida the relief it seeks.”

In its brief, the federal agency said it was possible that the U.S. Supreme Court could impose a water-use cap on Georgia without requiring the Corps to change its policies for handling the dams and reservoirs in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint river system.

“It thus may remain possible to design a consumption cap that would provide Florida with additional water at some points without any alteration of the Corps' operations, as Florida contends,” the Corps' brief said.

But the federal agency also said a court ruling requiring more extensive changes in the water-flow policies in the region would have to be viewed as “part of the constellation of laws to be considered by the Corps when deciding how best to operate the federal projects in the ACF (Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint) basin for their congressionally authorized purposes.”

“It is impossible to define the limits of the Corps' ability to make those releases consistent without knowing the precise contours of the decree and implications for other project purposes and storage regimens,” the brief said.

The brief also warned there is the “significant and difficult question” as to whether any additional water releases would be permitted under the already approved “master manual,” an operating guide for the water-control system in the region.

The Corps agreed this year to provide 621 million gallons per day to Georgia cities from the Lake Lanier reservoir near Atlanta. Florida opposed that decision, and environmental groups and the state of Alabama are challenging the decision in separate lawsuits.

The Corps' brief in the U.S. Supreme Court case is the latest step in the costly, protracted dispute between Florida and Georgia that resulted in a 2013 lawsuit alleging Georgia diverts too much water from the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint river system and that the diversions have damaged Apalachicola Bay and Franklin County's seafood industry, including its signature oysters.

Georgia, which wants the Supreme Court to adopt the special master's recommendation, has countered that any limits on its water use will undermine its economy, including the growth of the Atlanta area and the state's agriculture industry in southeastern Georgia.

In a brief filed this summer, Florida asked the Supreme Court to reject the special master's report and return the case for more deliberation.

Late last month, Florida's entire congressional delegation, including the two U.S. senators, wrote a letter to President Donald Trump asking that the administration and the Corps remain “neutral” in the dispute.

“Rather than intervening in Florida v. Georgia, it is our hope that the (Corps) will instead take all steps possible within its existing authorities to manage vital basins, including the ACF, in ways that protect downstream ecosystems and the communities that rely on them,” the delegation wrote.

In Tallahassee on Tuesday, U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., said he had not seen the Corps' brief but added, “I haven't been enamored by the way the Corps of Engineers has handled this issue.”

Nelson said the Corps' historic control of the water flow in the river basin has “starved” the Apalachicola River and Apalachicola Bay of the natural mix of freshwater and saltwater, which is critical to the oyster population.

Asked if he was confident that Florida would win a favorable decision from the Supreme Court, Nelson said: “I'm confident that at the end of the day the right thing is what should be done. The right thing is, all right, Georgia, you've got to start sharing your water like Mother Nature intended, instead of holding it all up for you.”


READ MORE FROM SUNSHINE STATE NEWS

Panhandle Pressure Mounts against Waste Management's Deep Well

'Florida will Roll Out the Welcome Mat for Veterans and their Families'

Comments

If this honorable court decides the Special Master has decided the merits of the case are correct and holds for Georgia, I suggest Florida re-investigate the possibilities to solve the problem for water for Appalachicola Bay. Instead of spending another 100 million for attorneys fees, perhaps the State of Florida would consider looking for other resolutions to the problems. I have suggested to interested parties, they consider a new technology to make fresh water from the Gulf, by Hydrokentic Wave Energy Technology. If that fresh water is pumped up river, then that water can pick-up "Organic Compounds", and would be as good as the water from the Appalachicola River, and as abundant as the authorities desire. The State of Florida would be able to add "Organic Compounds" to enhance the water feeding the oysters, and could actually grow Oyster faster that usual. I truly believe there is too much politics involved in this case. Lawyers have resigned their post as state employees to get on the Gravy Train, costing Florida Taxpayers "Millions of Dollars". This technology could be in place for a portion of what has been spent on Attorney Fees. The State needs to decide who their concerns are for, the citizens of Florida, or a cadre of Attorneys. Maybe the Governor would care to look at the issue and make a decision, concerning the legal cost of this trial.

The "U.S. Army Corps of Engineers" gives the "United States Army" a "bad name" and "taint's it's "hard won", honorable, historic reputation" ! I highly recommend changing the "name" of this 'back office', "highly POLITICAL group" of "heavy-handed" NATIONAL, construction Union workers to: "The U.S. FEDERAL CORPS OF ENGINEERS" to remove the overly existing confusion,.. and put its "purpose" where it belongs: in the D.C. Capitol's "political pettifoggers" realm ! ! !

Comments are now closed.

politics
advertisement

Opinion Poll

Do you think Jack Latvala will be found innocent?
Older pollsResults

Chatterbox

Live streaming of WBOB Talk Radio, a Sunshine State News Radio Partner.

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
advertisement